When you are planning to build a computer for the first time or you want to finally upgrade your computer after years, it is as if you are embarking on a mythical journey into the unknown. 

 AMD Vs. Intel: There are hundreds and maybe thousands of different components that can be purchased, but the first and most important question to ask is: Are you coming or Intel?

The Apple and Intel war, like Apple and Microsoft, is one of the biggest battles for computer users. One of the two giants of ultra-thin silicon chips will eventually capture the heart of your new computer. AMD and Intel are just as different as the products they make, but let’s go into detail to see which is a better choice for your new PC.

Promise against Intel: Worth buying

If cost savings when assembling or upgrading your computer are an important option, the best processor is often the one that pays the most for its price. If we consider only the price, performance chips are usually cheaper than Intel chips. Inexpensive Sempron, Athlon, or dual-core processors start at around $ 30. 

In contrast to low-cost Intel chips, such as the G3930 dual-core processor, it costs around $ 40. We see the same thing when looking at higher-performance processors, and usually the price of Intel-made chips is slightly higher than that of development chips.

Over the past decade, this pricing scenario has often been endorsed by experts until new Ryzen series processors came to market. The advent of these processors in early 2017 shattered that old formula, and the new Rayzen 7 1800x processor topped the list of high-end, high-end products. 

This product is an octa-core processor with 4 GHz turbo clock, which is one of the cheapest octa-core processors on the market today, even at a price of $ 460. The $ 300 Rayzen 7 1700 processor is even more economical, while you have to spend $ 600 to buy the cheapest eight Intel cores.

More accurate comparison

Meanwhile, the new Intel Core i9 and Threadripper processors are targeted at both techies and gamers alike, offering far higher performance. These processors are already upsetting the price-to-performance balance in the market. The Intel Core i9 7900x processor, which can not fit on older Intel motherboards, has 10 cores, 20 threads and a top speed of 4.3 GHz, and is currently priced at $ 966. But to better understand the difference in price versus price between the Tradripper processors and Intel X-Series chips, you need to look at the numbers below.

As shown in the table above, cheaper processors have higher base speeds and larger shared cache. However, compared to Intel X series chips, they require more power consumption and lower maximum speed. What do these mean to you? In short, the long-running revenue dispute between Intel and Intel is now more intense than ever, with more choices available to consumers. 

In sum, both companies produce processors that go hand in hand in every way (price, power, performance). Intel chips perform better than any other core, and Ayamdi is trying to offer more cores at the same price.

Coming against Intel: Game

Gaming is one of the areas where choosing a processor can be a daunting task. Intel processors have integrated graphics on the processor, but their performance is usually not comparable to separate graphics chips or add-on graphics cards. 

Desktop processors, meanwhile, do not have integrated graphics chips. Instead, Radeon integrates Radeon-branded processor cores and graphics cores into one package / chip, called an accelerated processing unit, or APU.

People who care about gaming usually use add-on graphics or separate GPUs instead of integrated GPUs. In this case, because of the way the processors are built in these two giants, Intel usually dominates the game performance. Input chips, especially the new Advisor processors, are excellent in multi-core modes and perform well in applications that support multi-core.

 Intel chips, on the other hand, are often the opposite, weak in heavy multicore settings, but perform very well in crisp constraints. 

Although games are more multi-core today than they used to be, they rarely use more than two to four cores, which usually leads to Intel’s superiority over optimization advisor optimization.

This gap is usually less noticeable, thanks to the new Zen architecture used in the cores of development consultant processors. We saw 10 frames less when we ran the internal benchmark of Civilization VI on the Raizen 7 1800x processor compared to the i7-7700k processor. 

When a game that requires more graphics, such as For Honor, runs on a pay-as-you-go processor, the gap narrows to an average of 109 frames per second, compared to 110 frames per second for Intel Core i7 processors.

When comparing Traderipur chips with Intel Core i9, we see that Intel has a slight advantage. We can not recommend any of them for the gaming system because games usually do not require the large number of processing cores contained in these processors. Finally, Intel chips are better for gaming today, but that does not mean that the future should be overlooked. 

Intel’s competitor offers processors that have high value in the game, such as the Advisor 5 chip.

AMD Vs. Intel: A difficult choice

However, keep in mind that the CPU is rarely a limiting factor in games. Investing in powerful graphics cards, if available at a reasonable price, usually results in better results than choosing a more powerful in-game processor.

Finally, there is an awesome selection that was introduced in November and fully launched in early January: the Core i7-8809G and three other Core-branded modules. These processors do not work wonders in the game, but instead of buying a weird set of separate Radeon graphics chips, HBM2 graphics memory, and an Intel processor, you can use this integrated solution.

In the Core i7-8809G processor, Intel is responsible for building the four cores of the seventh generation Kaby Lake and the components of the integrated HD Graphics 630 graphics processor.

 At the same time, it has provided 1536 Vega graphics cores (24 computing units) and HBM2 dedicated memory. 

Judgments about how this versatile chip works in benchmarks are not yet well established, but one of the first products to rely on this Core i7 module is the NUC “Hades Canyon”. The other three Intel modules are the Core i7-8709G, Core i7-8705G and Core i7-8706.

On the other hand, Iamadi has introduced new mobile processors with Raizen brand. By removing the APU logo, the four chips include processing cores based on the company’s new Zen architecture, and the graphics cards are based on the latest development architecture called Vega, which comes in two expensive desktop graphics cards, the expensive Radeon Vega 64 and Vega 56.

These companies have been used. These chips promise better performance than the previous generation, because Iamedi started his design work from scratch when he started building the Zen processor architecture.

Promise against Intel: Overclocking

Clock speeds are a good way to compare processors against each other, for example 2.7 GHz vs. 4.5 GHz. But keep in mind that these numbers are not fixed numbers. Increased clocks in some cases offer better temporary performance returns, but if you enter the field of overclocking, you can completely change the amount of this performance increase.

Overclocking a processor is a straightforward task depending on the method chosen, but it cannot be done on every processor. Most processors have “locked” coefficients that prevent any attempt to overclock. 

Fortunately, both Intel and Imedi offer overclockable processors at different prices. 

If you are looking for Intel overclockable processors, look for the letter k or x in the processor name, for example Core i7-8700k. In terms of availability, all Advisor chips support overclocking. However, not all of them support automatic overclocking, which is called XFR.

In general, overclocking is more about the chips themselves. In our tests, the Raizen 7 1800x processor performed better after overclocking; But it is not possible to get very high performance from eight-core processors. But the mid-range 1700 and 1700x chips perform better at overclocking speed management. 

The latest generation of Intel chips are potentially somewhat more overclocking, although their maximum speed is very low, but some of them have a higher maximum speed than others. In most cases of overclocking you need a good cooling system.

If you are looking to buy an overclocking processor in the market, expensive Intel processors have a lot to do with this and are a good option for people who want to get the most out of their chips by hosting new memory options. Affordable chips can also be overclocked, but cheaper Intel chips do not have this option.

‌AMD Vs. Intel: Who is the winner?

Expensive chips do not produce much different outputs than expensive Intel chips for everyday use. There are obvious differences in specific situations and benchmarks, but today, as in the past, the processor is no longer an indicator of computer performance. Processor processors are more valuable than Intel chips, especially in the mid- and low-price range. Conversely, Intel processors have more powerful single cores, and their gaming performance is even higher than that of the more powerful TraderRaper processors. Instead, people looking to use programs that fully support multicore are better off using modern desktop processors.

When it comes to upgrading your computer, it is best to compare the individual numbers of the performance of the chips you want to buy, but you should also consider these general guidelines as they provide a good starting point for your selection. 

Thanks to the excellent performance of Rayzen chips compared to previous generations in terms of power and purchase value, the processor market has become very competitive over the years after settling in at fixed points for many years. It can be argued that Intel is still a safe choice, especially for gamers, but performance has come out better than ever.

 For those who are assembling the system with a Jeep Perpol, Traderripper chips are a very powerful device that will catch the eye of the benchmarks.

However, older A-Series and FX chips are not and never will be in competition with Intel. So if you’re looking for older generations of hardware for every night, Intel is much safer.