SSD VPS Hosting, in simple words, can be defined as a ‘Solid State Drive VPS Hosting Plan’. Here the VPS Hosting service provider uses an SSD disk instead of the traditional Hard Disk Drive on their physical servers. The benefit of an SSD over HDD is that it consumes less power and delivers faster performance and speed. Let us see in detail, what distinguishes the two drives from one another.
SSDs got their name—solid state—because they use solidstate devices under the hood. In an SSD, all data is stored in integrated circuits. This difference from HDDs has a lot of implications, especially in size and performance. Without the need for a spinning disk, SSDs can reduce to the shape and size of a stick of gum (what’s known as the M.2 form factor) or even as small as a postage stamp. Their capacity—or how much data they can hold—varies, making them flexible for smaller devices, such as slim laptops, convertibles, or 2 in 1s. And SSDs dramatically reduce access time since users don’t have to wait for platter rotation to start up.
SSDs are more expensive than HDDs per amount of storage (in gigabytes (GB) and terabytes (TB)), but the gap is closing as SSD prices decline at a faster pace that HDD prices year over year.
Easily increase RAM, CPU and storage
Full Root and Administrator access
Automatic OS installation (Max installation 10 times)
All servers have a control panel to turn off, on and reset.
Share processes and data secure lona need to know basis
our team assured your web site is always safe and secure
We finally found a host that truly understood the unique
If you need advice, fill out the advice request form so that our experts can contact you .
SSDs are more expensive than hard drives in terms of dollar per gigabyte. A 1TB internal 2.5-inch hard drive costs between $40 and $60, but as of this writing, the very cheapest SSDs of the same capacity and form factor start at around $100. That translates into 4 to 6 cents per gigabyte for the hard drive versus 10 cents per gigabyte for the SSD. The differences are more drastic if you look at high-capacity 3.5-inch hard drives. For example, a 12TB 3.5-inch hard drive that sells for around $300 to $350 can push the per-gigabyte cost below 3 cents.
Since hard drives use older, more established technology, they will likely remain less expensive for the foreseeable future. Though the per-gig price gap is closing between hard drives and low-end SSDs, those extra bucks for the SSD may push your system price over budget.
Consumer SSDs are rarely found in capacities greater than 2TB, and those are expensive. You’re more likely to find 500GB to 1TB units as primary drives in systems. While 500GB is considered a “base” hard drive capacity for premium laptops these days, pricing concerns can push that down to 128GB or 256GB for lower-priced SSD-based systems. Users with big media collections or who work in content creation will require even more, with 1TB to 8TB drives available in high-end systems. Basically, the more storage capacity, the more stuff you can keep on your PC. Cloud-based storage may be good for housing files you plan to share among your smartphone, tablet, and PC, but local storage is less expensive, and you have to buy it only once, not subscribe to it.
This is where SSDs shine. An SSD-equipped PC will boot in far less than a minute, often in just seconds. A hard drive requires time to speed up to operating specs, and it will continue to be slower than an SSD during normal use. A PC or Mac with an SSD boots faster, launches and runs apps faster, and transfers files faster. Whether you’re using your computer for fun, school, or business, the extra speed may be the difference between finishing on time and being late.
A secondary issue to this: fragmentation. Because of their rotary recording surfaces, hard drives work best with larger files that are laid down in contiguous blocks. That way, the drive head can start and end its read in one continuous motion. When hard drives start to fill up, bits of large files end up scattered around the disk platter, causing the drive to suffer from what’s called “fragmentation.” While read/write algorithms have improved to the point that the effect is minimized, hard drives can still become fragmented to the point of affecting performance. SSDs can’t, however, because the lack of a physical read head means data can be stored anywhere without penalty. This contributes to SSDs’ inherently faster nature.
An SSD has no moving parts, so it is more likely to keep your data safe in the event you drop your laptop bag or your system gets shaken while it’s operating. Most hard drives park their read/write heads when the system is off, but when they are working, the heads are flying over the drive platter at a distance of a few nanometers. Besides, even parking brakes have limits. If you’re rough on your equipment, an SSD is recommended.
Because hard drives rely on spinning platters, there is a limit to how small they can be manufactured. Years back, there was an initiative to make smaller 1.8-inch spinning hard drives, but that stalled at about 320GB, and smartphone manufacturers only use flash memory for their primary storage.
SSDs have no such limitation, so they can continue to shrink as time goes on. SSDs are available in 2.5-inch laptop-drive sizes, but that’s only for convenience in fitting within established drive bays. They are increasingly moving, though, to the M.2 form factor discussed above, and these drives come in 42mm, 60mm, 80mm, and 120mm lengths.
Even the quietest hard drive will emit a bit of noise when it is in use. (The drive platters spin and the read arm ticks back and forth.) Faster hard drives will tend to make more noise than those that are slower. SSDs make no noise at all; they’re non-mechanical.
Plus, an SSD doesn’t have to expend electricity spinning up a platter from a standstill. Consequently, none of the energy consume by the SSD is waste as friction or noise, rendering them more efficient. On a desktop or in a server, that will lead to a lower energy bill. On a laptop or tablet, you’ll be able to eke out more minutes (or hours) of battery life.
There are multiple reasons SSDs are faster than HDDs. There are no moving parts or spinning platters, making access times substantially quicker, almost instantaneous in some cases. That means SSDs don’t suffer from degraded performance due to file fragmentation (where a file gets place in non-sequential sectors).
On a hard drive, the heads have to reposition the correct sector to read each fragment and then wait for the right part of the platter to spin under the drive head. As files get written, edited, and deleted, over time, this can slow down access to data on hard drives, especially for things like booting Windows.
With a clean Windows 10 build and a fast WD Black 4TB HDD, boot times (from the end of the BIOS POST sequence to being at the Windows 10 desktop) can take 20-30 seconds. On a slower WD Blue 2TB HDD, under the same circumstances, boot times are typically 30-40 seconds. And for just about any good SSD, booting in well under 10 seconds is typical.
Using an SSD for your boot drive is one of the most noticeable upgrades you can make on an older PC. Many people (including most of us at PC Gamer) refuse to use a PC that doesn’t have an SSD boot drive. It’s just not cricket.
Windows boot times are one thing, but games tend to behave differently. There’s a lot of sequential data to read. And usually, you’re not running a ton of other stuff in the background that’s hitting your storage. The practical difference for gamers between SSDs and HDDs isn’t as mind-blowing as the hyperbolic marketing copy from manufacturers would have you believe. It’s undoubtedly not imperceptible, but we’re talking in terms of seconds rather than minutes.
Testing a range of top SSDs, including add-in cards, NVMe, and SATA drives, against the best of a crop of 7200 RPM HDDs in Metro Exodus produced some significant results. Using the RDY ELIBG205 as a testbed (packed with a powerful Geforce RTX 2080 Ti and Core i9-9900K) and loading into the Taiga section of the primary campaign, the slowest of the HDDs (a Western Digital Blue 1TB) took just over 48 seconds to get us in-game, with the most fleet of the HDD pack (Western Digital’s 2TB Black) loading game play in 40 seconds. On the SSD side, the top-performing 480GB Intel Optane 900P add-in card delivered Taiga in just over 22 seconds. While the slowest of the SSDs we tested. The 500GB Western Digital Blue 3D SATA, took just clear of 33 seconds.
Those results might look pretty stark if you’re considering the best effect against the worst. However, a high-end Optane AIC is ridiculously expensive. And we’d stick with something more reasonable, like the XPG SX8200 Pro, which is nearly as fast. Contrast that with the WD Black 2TB: 16 seconds longer to load Metro Exodus, with twice the storage capacity and a lower price.
Obviously, if you have the cash and want top-performing hardware. SSDs will always be the better solution, especially if you don’t want to keep your friends waiting in the lobby. But if you’re more interested in value. HDDs look pretty attractive, even with TLC and QLC flash storage continuing to slip in price.
If you’re living under the tyranny of a data cap, this decision has likely already been made for you. Having to constantly redownload games in the shuffle that’s inevitable with just a single, limited capacity SSD vastly expands the value of capacious HDDs if you’re working with finite bandwidth. The same is true if you live in an area with poor internet connectivity. If a single AAA title takes an entire night to download .It can be a real deterrent to jumping back into older titles or taking a chance on new ones when it means having to clear drive space.
Even if you live somewhere with sturdy, reliable, blindingly fast internet, when you compare the length of time it takes to download titles against the slender moments you save in terms of load times, there’s not much difference, particularly in shorter or well-optimized games. Naturally, you may weigh that time differently, doing something else while a game downloads compared to the time you’re restlessly sitting, controller/mouse in hand while you’re waiting to play. Still, in terms of raw time saved, there’s not a tremendous overall difference.
Budget will always be a major consideration when you’re choosing whether or not it’s time to shift completely to an SSD lifestyle—in a world where you have access to unlimited discretionary income, of course, SSDs are the obvious option, as you can afford to stack them in multiples and surround them with the hardware to support them. But for the financial mortals among us, HDDs still have a place.
Even if you want an SSD for your boot drive (and you should), nabbing a cheap and capacious HDD for secondary or tertiary storage is arguably the best approach to a sometimes complex discussion. Use it for mass storage, most of your games library, videos, backups, and more. You can still put a few games on your SSD as well, but there are plenty of files that don’t need SSD speeds. We’ll be the first to welcome the solid-state future with open arms, but keeping a large HDD handy still makes sense.
There are other alternatives to just a pure HDD or SSD setup. Intel Optane Memory Provides a fast SSD cache that supplements your HDD, and you don’t need to worry about which data gets to reside on the faster cache—the software and drivers take care of that for you. AMD’s StoreMI (a branded variant of Emotus FuzeDrive) takes a slightly different approach, with tiered storage. You get the full capacity of the HDD+SSD, with the drivers and software managing where data is located.
In short, the debate over HDD vs. SSD storage isn’t over just yet. SSD capacities are increasing, and enterprise solutions can store up to 100TB on a single drive. That’s five times larger than the current top HDDs. However, the price for such drives isn’t even worth mentioning (*cough* $50,000 *cough*). We’re still a long way off from SSDs actually beating HDDs at a price per GB, and until that happens, HDDs will remain a viable option for many people and businesses.
Therefore in this article we discussed the SSD vs HHD and we hope you enjoy of reading that.
Since the SSD does not have any moving parts, it can keep the data safe in an event of dropping it. Unlike a mechanical HDD, which when subjected to a shock causes considerable manage, a SSD has the ability to withstand and handle shock better(like dropping the laptop bag). The absence of the moving parts also means that there is less occurrence of wear and tear in a SSD. Further, there is no mechanical failure in SSD meaning higher mechanical reliability. The SSD is lighter than a HDD and is resistant to shock and temperature changes.
A solid state drive consumes less power when compared to a HDD. This is primarily because a SSD lacks moving parts; especially does not have a motor. This is useful in storage computers and laptops where the power requirement is minimal. High-performance flash-based SSD requires only half to third of HDD power.
Solid state drives have faster reading and writing speed. On a SSD, there is no necessity for the drive platter to spin as in a HDD. Also, there is no actuator arm for moving the read/write heads that physically seek data (for or add) to the drive. Further, data reading and writing to flash memory chips occur instantly in a SSD, allowing the SSDs to have better reading and writing speeds.
This feature is highly useful for people and situations where data security is highly cardinal. When data is either overwritten or deleted on a HDD, there is a chance of recovery. Since the new data does not fall in line with the old data, there exists a chance for some old data to remain. On a SSD, data is deleted permanently leaving no minute traces of the old data.
because it uses computer chips and not moving parts. Since it is non-mechanical, there is virtually no noise.
The constant read performance feature makes file fragmentation is simple and a non-issue in a SSD. Data can be accessed in an instant regardless of where it is stored.
SSDs allow faster booting of computers as the drive is not required to spin up thereby improving the performance of the computer.
Because solid state drives lack motors, they generate less heat unlike HDDs. This is an important feature for people using laptops as it allows them to use their laptops with more comfort on their laps for longer time periods with the least worry about burns.
Although, the SSD had many advantages but there are certain disadvantages.
For decades, hard disk drives have been used as the main storage devices in the IT field, but with the latest technological advancements, solid-state storage has become the next step in performance improvements for both consumer desktop computers and servers alike.
Over the past few years, SSDs have become significantly larger in storage size and becoming more affordable, allowing them to be implemented in more complex server configurations.
Our VPS servers were previously all based on high-speed enterprise-grade Hard Disk Drives (HDDs). Even though they provide top-of-the-line read and write speeds and large amounts of storage space, they still rely on mechanically spinning magnetic drives to store data, which creates limits to the harnessed performance and gives a potential threat of drive failure.
HDDs store data by moving an actuator head that magnetizes or demagnetizes the part of the platter (hard disk) responsible for the information stored. Modern technological advancements allow for a faster, more reliable nonvolatile storage solution: solid-state drives (SSDs). Unlike traditional spinning drives, they solely rely on transistors and capacitors to store your data.
Solid-state drives lack moving parts and are not vulnerable to fragmentation, which allows them to have significantly higher performance than their mechanical counterparts. SSDs are using most of their components’ potential, only limited by the SATA connections they use.
Even though SSDs became available on the market in the mid-90s, only recently has the storage technology been ripe enough to incorporate into enterprise usage.
There are still a multitude of challenges that need to be faced when setting up servers based on SSD storage, but the expert networking team at Ded9 has been able to overcome said challenges and were able to launch our first servers completely based on solid-state drives in 2018. Since then, we were able to launch more SSD VPS servers in:
There is a common misconception on the amount of performance gained when upgrading from a traditional hard drive to solid-state storage. Most believe in a 50% to 100% performance increase, but that is simply untrue.
To put it into a better perspective, an average HDD will have a throughput of up to 200MB/s. However, a modern SSD can have a read speed of up to 3,500MB/s and a write speed of up to 2,100MB/s. This example shows a performance increase of 1,650% in reading speeds and 950% in write speeds.
However, the above example is just that, an example. Real-life performance is based on many more factors than just read and write speeds. One such factor is the configuration in which the said SSD is set up.
Ded9 SSD VPS servers use enterprise-grade high-speed SSDs combined with a complex RAID10 setup, allowing for up to 300,000 IOPS (Input/output Operations Per Second). Despite the astronomical performance of our storage solutions, we do not compromise on data redundancy, meaning that the information stored on your VPS is safe in case of any possible server issues.
At the start of your website, it’s best to choose a shared hosting service, but as the site grows, so should the needs, and this is the point where you should consider upgrading to a virtual private server.
Since the resources for a VPS are not shared, your website will be much faster and more responsive. That’s all good, but how can you choose the best VPS for you? How can you pick the VPS which suits you the best?
Let’s go through the VPS plans at Monovm and boil down to the key factors that you need to look for in a Virtual Private Server. The best VPS hosting provider is the one that meets all your needs, and the key factors to look at before getting a VPS is the:
The choice of a VPS depends on your needs. Suppose you are growing on your website, and the shared hosting is not enough. In that case, it’s better to go to a budget-friendly VPS server to get that extra dedicated resource.
On the other hand, if your website has a lot of high-quality content, then it’s better to choose a plan with higher storage, RAM, and CPU.
We have three different types of VPS hosting:
Automatic installation of operating systems on a server is one of ShopingServer key features. Due to this feature a customer can get a ready-to-go server right after the payment has been made.
In our services, you have direct access to the server console
CentOS 6, 7, 8; Debian 8, 9, 10; Ubuntu 14.04, 16.04, 18.04; Windows Server 2012, 2016, 2019.
You can pay your invoices in renew VPS or new order VPS with BTC