DED9

Buying Guide For Gaming Monitor At Different Prices

A Gaming Console Is Not Complete Without A Well-Proportioned Display. In This Article, We Will Review The Types Of Screens And Selection Criteria For Buying The Best Gaming Models.

Gaming Monitor, A gaming console is not complete without a well-proportioned display. This article will review the types of screens and selection criteria for buying the best gaming models.

Professional gamers should always think about choosing a monitor that fits their gaming computer’s needs and capabilities after being comfortable with selecting the parts of their favorite gaming case and assembling their favorite game. A gaming device without a powerful monitor with appropriate capabilities can not give the gamer a great visual experience and distinctive game consoles.

We know that until now, game consoles have generally been connected to regular monitors or TVs capable of displaying 60Hz high-quality images. Still, PC monitors have been equipped with more advanced capabilities to make images smoother, better quality, and delayed for many years. Show less, and this is not possible without a graphics card and robust components in the gaming computer.

Previously, choosing the suitable model was limited to screen size, resolution, or resolution based on the number of pixels and refresh rate. With the advancement of display technology, choosing the suitable model for the gaming system has become even more difficult. From technologies such as Nvidia’s G-Sync and FreeSync, both of which have been developed to fix image fragmentation, to some models with image recovery rates of up to 144 and 250 Hz (number of repetitions per second).

Although the quality of display in different panels has increased significantly in recent years, the quality difference between different types of meetings, including TN, IPS, and VA panels there, is still. For example, gamers working in e-sports should have the most negligible screen delay, but if you are interested in shooter and first-person shooter games, a fast screen with more HDR capability will be a priority for you.

A gaming computer with two gaming monitors and a RGB color keyboard and mouse

Types of display panels

IPS panels are the best and most balanced technology available in terms of image quality, color accuracy, and viewing angle

Standard LCD monitors (liquid-crystal displays) are flat-panel displays consisting of liquid crystals and several polarizing filters. Liquid crystals do not emit light directly and use background light to emit light and display images in different colors. Older LCDs used fluorescent lamps to produce backlighting. Still, the use of light-emitting diodes or LEDs to make light has long replaced fluorescent lamps that are both less energy consuming and create higher contrast. LCDs that use LEDs for backlighting are also abbreviated as LEDs, which some people mistakenly think have replaced LCDs, while only the brightness output has changed.

OLED (organic light-emitting diode) panels are still not standard due to their high cost and the difficulty of large-scale production for use in PC monitors and are not the subject of our discussion here. But LCDs are made of different types, which we will describe in the following. Newer, newer OLED panels, unlike LCDs, are made of light-emitting diodes that produce light data and do not require backlighting.

TN panel

TN panels (abbreviated as Twisted Nematic ) have long been used in displays, have the highest output and lowest manufacturing cost, and at the same time, their most significant advantage is the shortest response time among the available types. But on the other hand, the disadvantage of this panel is the limited viewing angle and less contrast than different types. TN panels can only produce 6 bits per color in the color spectrum (the entire color spectrum for 16.7 million colors consists of 3 colors blue, red, and green with 8-bit data, making up a total of 24 bits of data); and They use a technique called dithering to simulate other colors. But the quality of TN panels has dramatically improved in recent years, and its high-end models display acceptable quality in many applications.

Panel VA

VA ( Vertical Alignment ) panels can display higher quality color spectra than TN panels and have a better viewing angle. Despite these advantages, their overall response speed is slower than TN and even IPS panels. The contrast of these models is usually higher than the average of other panels, and they show black color and dark scenes with more realistic quality. VA panels can produce 8-bit colors, and a variety of them can be called MVA, S-PVA, and of course, AMVA  (short for Advanced MVA).

IPS panel

IPS ( In-Plane Switching ) panels may be considered the best and most balanced technology available regarding image quality, color accuracy, and viewing angle. Therefore, they have more acceptance and priority for designing graphic works and producing media content. The response speed of these panels is higher than VA types but slower than TN. These panels are also 8-bit and support the whole color gamut. S -IPS and H-IPS are subsets of this technology, and Samsung PLS panels are manufactured initially with IPS technology. PLS  offers a better viewing angle and more brightness. The famous panel maker, AUO, invented even the AHVA panel; contrary to some people’s beliefs, it is a kind of IPS panel and not VA.

Color display in pixel dimensions in IPS, TN, and VA panels from top to bottom, top, bottom, and sides, respectively

Refresh rate

Refresh rate is the number of updates or drawings of the display image per second and is based on the frequency calculation unit, i.e., Hertz. A 60 Hz panel reconstructs the image received from the graphics card up to 60 times per second.

Of course, the refresh rate should not be confused with the frame rate used to process the graphics card output, as the refresh rate can include the repetition of a frame. Still, the frame rate is the number of repetitions of a whole structure with new data for The display points to the monitor.

G-Sync  vs. FreeSync

Developed. At the beginning of this article, we mentioned that Nvidia and Imedi had developed their proprietary technologies to address this problem by sometimes providing a way to implement a dynamic image refresh rate ( Screen Tearing ). ) G-Sync technology requires the installation of a hardware chip inside the display. Still, according to the Adaptive-Sync standard, FreeSync uses the graphics card capability to synchronize the frame rate and image refresh rate on the monitor and does not require separate hardware inside the display.

How Nvidia G-Sync technology works in syncing frames and scanning a new image on the display panel

That’s why G-Sync-branded monitors are much more expensive than similar monitors with the same panel and specifications but with FreeSync technology. In addition, monitor makers will need to pay a fee for advanced on-screen testing and Nvidia endorsement for G-Sync if they use FreeSync technology. Free for builders.

The two technologies are very similar in performance, and by synchronizing the “frame drawing operation in the graphics card output buffer” and the “screen refresh operation,” so-called scanning, eliminate the cut and tearing effect on the screen. Even interrupts or stutters that result in V-Sync activation in games will be avoided, so owners of G-Sync and FreeSync monitors should not enable the V-Sync option in the game’s graphical settings.

In addition,  FreeSync has its drawbacks, including the more limited range of image refresh rates, ranging from 36 to 75 Hz depending on the model and up to 144 Hz on more advanced models. If the game frame rate is outside this range, FreeSync will not work.

The good news is that Nvidia recently allowed GeForce graphics cards to work with standard Adaptive-Sync technology  (a standardized form of FreeSync), which is compatible with the G-Sync Compatible standard with FreeSync displays, and the image refresh rate Provide dynamic.

HDR

HDR (High Dynamic Range) monitors can display higher quality shadows and deeper colors. The ability to communicate much higher contrast is a prerequisite for the HDR panel. Darker and brighter scenes on an HDR monitor will display more promising than a standard monitor. HDR implementation is not the same between monitors and TVs, and the technology has several variants such as Dolby Vision, HDR10, and HDR10 +, among which HDR10  support is more common among manufacturers.

G-Sync Ultimate and  FreeSync Premium Pro

G-Sync Ultimate is the same G-Sync technology Nvidia has added to the minimum HDR requirements. The display that receives this badge must produce a contrast of 1000-nit.

A display with this much contrast has a Full Array Backlighting Local Dimming backlight, described below. FreeSync Premium Pro is a regular FreeSync with HDR capability, and at least a 120Hz panel added to the requirements. The FreeSync Premium logo includes only FreeSync technology and a 120Hz panel and lacks HDR ability.

Full-Array Backlighting and Local Dimming

A monitor with a full array of background light sources ( Full Array Backlighting ) can display the best possible contrast with the highest quality. The Local Dimming technique also approaches the display of dark colors and light shadows in reality by turning off the backlight in areas that are supposed to be dim and steps into the range that OLED displays and old plasmas were skilled at creating. The quality of Local Dimming depends on the number of areas in which the backlight is distributed.

Arrangement of LED lamps to produce backlight in two ways: Full-array and Edge-lit

Edge lighting

In this background light model, unlike the Full Array Backlighting method, light-emitting diodes are used only at the edges of the screen to provide whole LCD light. As a result, the advantages of such displays are usually brighter than the center, and it is challenging to achieve proper uniformity or uniformity of the backlight.

Flicker-free

Flicker refers to the suggestion and jumps in images due to the rapid change in background light. This problem is well known in CRT monitors, short for cathode ray tubes, but it still exists. Contrary to popular belief, LCD monitors are no exception, as some have PWM modulation control for brightness control. By reducing the brightness adjustment and dimming, the Flicker in the image becomes more noticeable as the period of the active backlight in each PWM cycle is shortened. This problem is much more pronounced in monitors with LED backlight because the light LED background _ Reacts faster to changes in inflow.

Compare the animated image on the monitor with the Flicker-Free feature on the left and without this feature on the right.

Displays with Flicker-free feature use Direct Current or DC instead of PWM to generate brightness, which does not have the same effect when displaying images and does not cause eye fatigue.

OverDrive  – Trace Free – AMA

Due to the nature of their construction and the way they work, LCD monitors are prone to producing a ghostly sequence on moving objects callGhostinging. Asymmetric transfer speeds in pixels usually cause ghosting. It means that LCD pixels often move faster or more completely to a particular color and return later than a specific color. This difference in color change speed creates an edge or sequence in moving objects on the LCD screen.

OverDrive, AMA, or Trace Free techniques: different manufacturers have given other names to this troubleshooting technique. They are supposed to reduce the creation of this ghost on moving images or eliminate it. Of course, increasing the rate of image refresh in the panel or using faster panels of 120, 144, and 240 Hz can also logically reduce the effect of this problem, and the higher the image frequency, the less the effect Ghosting.

The effect of the Overdrive technique on the display quality of moving objects at different display frequencies and different degrees

This technique helps increase the speed of color change in pixels and reduce the blurring of objects while moving by increasing the voltage in the pixels. Of course, if this increase in voltage is more than necessary, it will cause inverGhostingng, which is the opposite of the previous state and will cause an edge on the other side of the moving object.

For this feature, most manufacturers have considered adjusting the degree or amount of application of this technique in their monitors so that users can choose the amount that has the best visual efficiency and balance to use Trace Free or OverDrive in their monitors; depending on the image frequency.

If the monitor responds to each pixel with laboratory accuracy, an oscilloscope and photosensor measure the transition time from each color to other colors, from 0 for black to 255 for black. For example, the results of the Asus PG278Q display test at 144 Hz and the Normal settings for OverDrive are as follows:

The results of the response rate test for each pixel for different colors in the off state at the top and standard at the bottom

As you can see, without using OverDrive and pixel acceleration, the delay in switching between some colors (for example, from 0 to 150, which is 11 milliseconds) is much faster than the response speed advertised for this display, which is one millisecond. It is clear that the manufacturer’s rate is the best and most ideal speed, and using the OverDrive technique to improve the results. The amount of overshoot or the same error in accelerating and sharpening the image is still in the appropriate range and very good.

Based on this, the OD technique used in this display at a frequency of 144 Hz has succeeded in significantly reducing the response speed with a minor error. The G2G index (stands for Gray to Gray, which measures the average response speed in pixels), used Common among manufacturers, has dropped from 6.9 milliseconds to 2.9 milliseconds.

ULMB

Ultra Low Motion Blur, or ULMB for short, was developed by Nvidia and is specifically designed to reduce the effect of motion blur by simulating the technique used in CRT monitors. ULMB reduces motion blur, which significantly impacts playing fast games such as shooters but reduces the image’s brightness.

This technique is also called strobe backlighting. This technique was initially invented for 3D glasses but was also used in new displays.

The difference between displaying fast objects on the screen with frequencies of 60 and 120 Hz and ULMB mode

The best gaming monitors in various categories

In this section, according to the latest products globally and reviewing reputable sites, we introduce some of the best displays offered by different manufacturers. Some of these models may be scarce in the domestic market or have an incorrect price, but in any case, they will be effective as a model for choosing the best in the coming months.

ASUS VG255H

The most economical 1080p gaming display suitable for consoles and PCs

Page size: 24.5 inches | Image resolution: 1920 x 1080 | Panel type: TN | Dimensions ratio: 16 to 9 | Image refresh rate: 75 Hz | Response time: 1 millisecond | Weight: 4.9 kg | Other features: Flicker Free, FreeSync or Adaptive-Sync at 40 to 75 Hz.

This relatively inexpensive Asus monitor with two HDMI inputs can connect to the console and PC simultaneously, and the user can switch between them from the display menu whenever needed. The color rendering quality and viewing angle appear high for a TN panel. The VG255H monitor also has a frequency of 60 Hz, which reaches 75 Hz with overclocking, and Free Sync (or Adaptive Sync, which also works with Nvidia Pascal series graphics cards or higher), which helps to avoid tearing in moving images.

BenQ Zowie XL2411P

The best high frequency 1080p gaming display

Page size: 24 inches | Image resolution: 1920 x 1080 | Panel type: TN | Dimensions ratio: 16 to 9 | Image refresh rate: 144 Hz | Response time: 1 millisecond | Weight: 3.6 kg | Other features: Flicker Free and  Low Blue Light.

The ZOWIE XL2411P monitor is designed for gaming with a high frame rate and 144 Hz. It also has almost all communication standards with DVI, HDMI, and DisplayPort inputs.

It has a high response speed and meager input and is a good option for competitive online games at high frame rates. The quality of the colors and the viewing angle are also higher than average despite the panel being TN.

BenQ PD3200U

The best display for graphic designers

Page size: 32  inches | Image resolution: 3840 by 2160 | Panel type: IPS | Dimensions ratio: 16 to 9 | Image refresh rate: 60 Hz | Response time: 4 milliseconds | Weight: 8.5 kg | Other features:  AMA, Flicker Free, Low Blue Light,  100% sRGB color gamut coverage, built-in speaker and headphone jack, USB 3.0 port, and Card Reader.

Be suitable. Utilizing an IPS quality panel and providing a relevant color spectrum for designers and CAD / CAM and animation software, this monitor can meet the professional demands of these users and have an appropriate response speed for gaming in 4K and 60 Hz resolution. A high-speed USB 3.0 hub and even a Card Reader are built into the display bezel for output. The video inputs of this device are complete, and there is no shortage in this regard.

ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q

The best gaming monitor in all respects (for robust PCs)

Page size: 27 inches | Image resolution: 2560 x 1440 | Panel type: IPS | Dimensions ratio: 16 to 9 | Image refresh rate: 144 Hz (with 165 Hz overclocking) | Response time: 4 milliseconds | Weight: 7 kg | Other features: G-Sync, Flicker Free, Trace Free, Low Blue Light, ULMB, stereo speakers and two USB 3.0 ports.

This display has a very high-quality IPS panel and actual 8-bit color, and yet it has recorded a high response speed in tests, which makes it very suitable for fighting games, racing, and shooting. It has a great viewing angle and can use the G-Sync chip to synchronize with the output frame rate of your GeForce graphics card.

It also has a high pixel density due to its 2K resolution, and the texts are displayed with much higher quality. This gaming monitor is designed to run games at a frame rate above 60 frames and in the range of 100 to 144 frames per second, and for such speed requires a powerful graphics card in the middle or higher category. Models like the GTX 1660Ti or RX 5700 can run at 2K resolution and high frame rates.

Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ

Best 4K display for gaming (for professional category PCs)

Page size: 27 inches | Image resolution: 3840 by 2160 | Panel type: IPS | Dimensions ratio: 16 to 9 | Image refresh rate: 120 Hz (144 Hz with overclocking) | Response time: 4 milliseconds | Weight: 9.2 kg | Other features: Local Dimming, Flicker Free, G-Sync, Low Blue Light, HDR, Quantum Dot, and two USB 3.0 ports.

Achieve very high contrast and high quality HDR1000 output, especially in games that have been seen on fewer screens before. The IPS panel of this display is made with Quantum Dot technology to communicate more prominent colors. Beyond that, the backlight system in this display is of the type of Local Dimming array, which is distributed behind all parts of the panel and can turn off the LED in dark areas of the image.

Because its 4K resolution requires a powerful graphics card, preferably from Nvidia and the RTX generation, to display all its capabilities. It should note that the video output of this model in 4K mode with HDR data is limited to only 98 Hz. Otherwise, it must display the data sent from the graphics card in  4: 2: 2  Y’CbC format, which is Dithering or Chroma. It is also called subsampling, and the difference with 4: 4: 4 “R’G’B is more pronounced in the display of texts. One of the disadvantages of this monitor is its very high price, which makes it difficult for many users to buy this product.

Acer Predator XB273K

Best 4K Alternative Gaming Display (for Professional Classes)

 

Page size: 27 inches | Image resolution: 3840 by 2160 | Panel type: IPS | Dimensions ratio: 16 to 9 | Image refresh rate: 144 Hz | Response time: 4 milliseconds | Weight: 7.2 kg | Other features: Flicker Free, G-Sync, Low Blue Light, HDR400 stereo speakers, and four USB 3.0 ports.

This monitor from Acer is also one of the best 4K models. Still, it differs from the PG27UQ model in using ordinary backlight Edge lighting at the edges of the screen, making its contrast suitable only for the HDR400 and slightly different from It has an average SDR output.

However, it has a high response speed and is suitable for playing in heavy 4K resolution and high image quality. More importantly, it has a much more reasonable price than the Asus flagship model and has a very high purchase value.

What monitors do you use for your console and PC, and how satisfied are you with them? Please share your opinions and experiences with us.

Die mobile Version verlassen