DED9

AMD vs Intel: Which CPUs Are Better for your PC in 2023?

At the highest point of deciding to buy a suitable device, there is a basic question that is very important to answer. AMD or Intel? Comparing these two is like comparing Apple with Microsoft or comparing Fortnite with Apex Legend. AMD’s competition with Intel is one of the most interesting debates among computer enthusiasts. AMD and Intel are different in terms of the products they market.
Let’s take a deeper look at which parts from these two companies are best for your new computer.

 

Characteristics of suitable processors for desktops

Considering that nowadays price is one of the important factors in buying any device and product, after quality, the most important factor that should be considered when buying a suitable processor is its suitable price. If we consider only the price, it should be said that the parts produced by AMD are usually cheaper than similar samples produced by Intel. The price of low-end dual-core AMD Sempron, Athlon, or Dual-Core A-series processors starts at around $40 while the lowest price of similar Intel companies starts at around $50. These processors are not very upgradeable due to their low price. Our suggestion to you as a similar example with better quality that is also more easily upgradeable is the Ryzen 3 2200G, whose price starts at around $90. Of course, the Intel 8100 isn’t a bad option either, but it costs around $135, which may seem a bit expensive.

The second generation of AMD Ryzen 2700X processors with eight cores and 16 different options is at the highest level of the tests, the price of which starts at around $280. While the price of Intel’s highest model, the eight-core 9900K with 16 different options, starts at $485. To have more options on average, our recommended parts from Intel are: Core i5 9400F at $160 and Core i7 9700K at $410.3

AMD recently introduced the new Ryzen 3000 series, which will be officially launched in early July. So, if you want to upgrade your processor, it’s better to hold back a bit.
Intel Core i9 and AMD Threadripper processors allow advanced and targeted users and enthusiasts to continue their multitasking performance by expanding the core count and upgrading tasks. Intel’s 7th and 9th generation processors have about ten to eighteen cores, and with multi-faceted performance, it allow you to do 36 different tasks. Of course, the price of these processors with such performance is very high, and the price of the 9980XE model reaches about 2000 dollars.

On the other hand, the chips produced by AMD have more cores, lower prices, and more uniform specifications. The first generation of Threadripper CPUs, despite the options of 8 to 12 cores, are priced at only a few hundred dollars, which is considered a relatively reasonable price. However, the current generation of Threadripper 2000 processors has about 12 to 32 cores and with 64 facets, they are able to perform 64 different tasks at the same time. More expensive models cost around $600 to $1,700. If you are looking for an upgradeable model with higher options and a reasonable price, we suggest you the $830 Threadripper model with a price of $830.
All Threadripper chips support 64 PCI Express lanes. which is a great advantage among the 44 different processors of Intel. Of course, it should be remembered that these parts consume more battery and energy due to having more cores.

Characteristics of suitable processors for laptops

The story of the laptop market is completely different. Many of you are probably familiar with the different generations of Intel processors and their upgraded graphics used on your device. As Dell proved last year, Intel’s processor lineup is much more diverse than AMD’s. Therefore, the gap between the two companies in terms of market share and usage is significant.

AMD is a group that has been at the heart of many laptop hardware in recent years, especially in 2019. However, it still has little demand in the market like the new Acer Swift 3 chassis. Today, the processor market has been swallowed by Intel processors. There is a wide range of CPUs of this company’s 8th and 9th generation that users can choose from. Among the latest generation of these CPUs, we can mention the 10th generation Intel Ice Lake processors, which are equipped with the 11th generation onboard graphics. This generation features some of the most powerful and efficient laptops available. And they are used on new Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 laptops.

Generally, if you’re looking for a good laptop with all-around power, Intel Core i5 processors from the latest generations are a good choice. Core i7 and Core i9 models have higher processing power. However, if you don’t do heavy work with your device, a Core i5 CPU is a good choice for you.

In general, both companies produce processors that are significantly different in terms of price and other features. The price, power and performance of Intel processors are in a higher category compared to AMD, while AMD compensates for Intel’s shortcomings with more cores for a given price and equipped with onboard graphics.

 

Gaming

The gaming series is one of the series that putting a CPU on them may seem a bit gimmicky. All Intel processors include enhanced on-die graphics. But still, the performance of the device is not enhanced through separate graphics chips and graphics cards. Meanwhile, most AMD processors used on desktops are not equipped with integrated graphics. Of course, some of them that have integrated graphics are known as AMD APUs, in which a Ryzen-type CPU core is combined with Radeon graphics in one place.
has been used. It should be noted that the graphics capabilities of these processors are better compared to the graphics capabilities of Intel onboard cores, but their general processing is weaker compared to the same Intel sample. But this paradigm may be changed by the new generation of Intel Ice Lake CPUs.
In general, whether you choose an Intel or AMD processor, you should spend around $200-$400 for a gaming processor, and even more if you need a high-end chip with high frame rates with simultaneous streaming and frames.

For those seriously considering a gaming rig, it’s best to consider an add-on graphics card or discrete GPU rather than integrated graphics (which is the best choice). In such cases, since these two giants of processor components have made their own components, Intel tends to interfere with gaming performance. This company’s 9900K series processors are undoubtedly the most powerful gaming series processors at the moment. However, the initial criteria for making this series of parts may seem a little suspicious. AMD chips, especially the latest Ryzen CPU series of this company, are an excellent choice for multitasking and running applications that require multi-core performance. Intel chips, unlike AMD, are somewhat slow in multitasking, but on the contrary, they are more advanced in limited operations.

They include two tetrahedrons. This gives Intel a special advantage, even with AMD’s advanced Ryzen series processors.
The quality gap between the chips provided by Intel and AMD has been reduced to a great extent due to the powerful cores used in the new Ryzen series CPUs provided by AMD. So far, a drop of around 10 FPS has been observed when running the Civilization VI internal benchmark on the Ryzen 7 1800X CPU compared to the same i7-7700K sample. Of course, we must remind that this reduction becomes less when playing games like Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey, which require higher graphics to run, with the Ryzen processor whose FPS was measured at 109, compared to the Intel Core i7 CPU, whose FPS was around 110.

But we must remember that when comparing the Threadripper series with a powerful Core i9 chip from Intel, Intel still has an edge over AMD because you can easily get a Core i9-9900K processor for around $485.
The upcoming Ryzen 3000 CPUs may offer better gaming performance compared to Intel’s similar series. Therefore, to buy a suitable CPU, be sure to consider the reviews that will be presented in the coming months.

But in general, Intel chips are considered more suitable for today’s tasks. However, that doesn’t mean AMD chips shouldn’t be considered at all. In fact, Intel’s main competitor offers processors like Ryzen 5 that can greatly increase the value of gaming performance. In fact, we usually recommend AMD processors to users with more basic performance or a lower budget. Because despite the fact that they have almost the same performance as their Intel counterparts, they are more affordable. Even in lower-end models, AMD’s Ryzen series with Vega APUs offer good gaming performance. Therefore, they can be considered as a good choice. However, due to their lower processing capacities, they may not perform well in the long run, unless you decide not to upgrade your system for a long time.

It should be remembered that when it comes to running various games, CPU is rarely considered as a limiting factor. In fact, when it comes to gaming performance, a graphics card is a more important factor than a powerful processor. However, keep in mind that synchronization technologies such as FreeSync and G-Sync can make a significant difference in gaming performance. Whether your processor is optimized or not.

In some cases, you choose between the processors offered by these two companies. These two companies have recently collaborated to design hybrid chips with Intel CPUs and AMD graphics, which have features similar to Core i7-8809G processors. We consider the 8809G-equipped “Hades Canyon” NUC to be a gaming machine. Therefore, it can be said that this cooperation can be considered as a foundation for cooperation to provide other hardware fields.

Finally, which company is the winner in this competition?

For everyday tasks, a high-end AMD processor isn’t much different from a similarly high-end Intel processor. Of course, there are contradictions in certain scenarios and criteria. However, the CPU is not the only basic part used on the computer to determine its features.

AMD processors are said to have lower performance on average than Intel processors. On the other hand, Intel CPUs have a single-core performance as well as stronger gaming performance compared to the most powerful AMD Threadripper processors. Instead, those who are looking to use heavy multifaceted programs, it is better to benefit from a modern AMD processor due to the reduction in the price of these CPUs. In the market, such a choice is considered a better choice.

When it comes to choosing the next upgraded version, looking at the functions of the chip in question separately is the best way to choose the right part. But in general, considering these functions in general will give you a good perspective for a good choice. AMD chips are a more suitable choice for users who work at the elementary and intermediate levels. Even on more expensive gaming devices, they outperform Intel processors. But we should note that this does not happen when you are working with an Intel 9900K processor that costs more than $500. But AMD Threadripper series parts are also better to consider considering their price. Especially if you do more than just run PC games with your gaming CPU.

Finally, keep in mind that the new generation that will be released by Intel and AMD in the future may change this scenario completely. AMD’s Ryzen 3000 series CPUs are a series that has greatly improved the chips produced by AMD and has given them great efficiency. This series will be released on July 7, 2019. So, stay tuned to see how this chip fares after the advanced testing done on it.

Die mobile Version verlassen