Everything about Robopets
Do not try to replace pets with robots – instead, design robots that look more like service animals. Using Robopets technology to spy on the elderly raises privacy concerns.
Robots are artificial intelligent machines designed to look like animals (usually a cat or a dog, but they can be any animal). There are currently several robots on the market sold to consumers as “pets” or pets by purchasing these robots for the elderly to replace dead or delivered companion animals. A serious effort is being made to reassure caregivers.
Animal lovers will advise you that they would relatively have nothing at all other than have a robot as their pets. While a robot can be programmed to simulate the actions of a real animal, people know that it is, after all, a fake animal.
The need for a companionship-based marketing strategy – which has profound ethical issues associated. Replacing the emotional bond between living organisms – should be used for robots. And it should first be justified to address the needs currently being met by service animals.
New markets
However, there is a vast and still intact market for robots and other social robots to play the role of service robots. Let’s call them Serv-U-Bot. These individual service robots are various from those designed to replace humans in some areas of production and services.
Using mobile robots may reduce depression, loneliness, and irritability in the elderly.
Serv-U-Bots are similar to a small, portable robot designed for personal use. And use many of the technologies used in social robots already built.
Their built-in sensors can include surveillance cameras, microphones for recording sound, temperature sensors, communication technologies. And even automatic actuators that move based on programming, not human input. Serv-U-Bots are programmed to replace service animals that are currently being trained and trained to support human mobility and independence. However, this upbringing and education is an expensive endeavor.
Many service organizations that provide service animals have large breeding programs. Training facilities and budgets subsidized by donors or reimbursed by governments, insurers, or families. The Canadian Guide Dogs Association for the Blind graduates approximately 23 dogs annually from its training program, with an average operating cost of more than $ 74,300 per dog.
The organizations that breed and train these dogs are not considered pets. They are service dogs trained to assist. If their current position ends due to the death of the person they helped or for other reasons, they will generally be returned to the organization for another place.
Using technology to create opportunities for human-to-human or human-to-animal interaction is one way to increase well-being without sacrificing privacy.
Robots as service animals
But what about substituting service dogs with Serv-U-Bots, social robots programmed to perform service-related tasks? We have the technical knowledge to create Serv-U-Bots that can increase their autonomy through programming that, for example, warns if toast burns, the kettle boils, doorbells ring, and so on. They can even operate medical alert dogs to detect medical problems such as seizures or low blood sugar or alert the user to allergens.
Serv-U-Bots can even support older people to continue to enjoy feeding animals, checking for water, and even cleaning their trash cans.
Suppose one can plan to drive on one’s own to avoid obstacles and forms of life. Why not plan a Serv-U-Bot to guide people across the city? They can also be programmed to facilitate fundamental relations with living items. This technology can save and improve lives and help mobile people. Serv-U-Bots can support the needs of human independence and mobility without exploiting and exploiting non-human animals.
Use a robot to care for the elderly.
Social isolation and loneliness are a concern for many older people. And this feeling can be triggered by the need to move to an apartment, rented house, long-term care center, or nursing home.
Sometimes, the most significant thing that stands between an elderly and lonely person may be a lovable pet. This reciprocal relationship of love and attention between humans and non-human animals translates into physical and mental health benefits. However, pets can not be moved with their older adults in many cases. Very few jurisdictions guarantee the right to get an animal to a rented unit or apartment.
Social robots are a new tool for caring for the elderly.
Home monitoring
Many older people find themselves under increasing scrutiny, whether you go to a long-term care center or a smaller home. Good family and caregivers install cameras, sensors, and other devices to monitor the elderly. Social robots are a new tool for caring for the elderly. They offer some health services such as medication reminders. But most attempt to make up for the lack of human or animal companionship. These robots have artificial intelligence (AI) designed to interact and create comfort for the user.
The ElliQ, for example, is a small desktop device that interacts with a screen so that “family members can easily check it out.” It also interacts with the user, suggests activities, and responds to their voice, touch, or appearance. ElliQ is always on and collects user information passed to the manufacturer.
Jenny is a robot dog controlled by voice commands through a smartphone app. Like other social robots, robot pets are designed to respond to the user’s emotions and are constantly monitored for this purpose. Response of social robots and pets Robots depend on the existence and use of sensors to detect emotional responses, record emotions and send this information to be analyzed by algorithms that make robots responsive. The results of data analysis cause the robot to smile, scream or lie down. If you need a health response, some robots, for example, can alert the caregiver to high blood pressure.
Collect personal information
Each stage of this data process contains personal and sensitive information about an individual. For example, user identification data may leak into the sensor layer or the cloud, where the data is analyzed to determine the appropriate response. User profiles not only contain information such as name and address. But also collect information about the user’s moods, behaviors, and habits.
Serv-U-Bots can support the needs of human independence and mobility without exploiting and exploiting non-human animals.
Between the ability to exploit data and “the ubiquitous use of cameras and sound monitoring equipment in the home environment. There are privacy concerns that can affect a person’s mental health.”
Older people are not always aware of the amount of supervision, leading to feelings of shame and humiliation, for example. When someone is singing, dancing, going to the toilet, or crying. This does not mean that more aged people do not notice the presence of surveillance equipment. But instead that the always-on 24-hour aspect is unfamiliar to them. While enabling older people to live with less contact with humans or animals, these surveillance systems and robots can increase their vulnerability and vulnerability.
Peer networks
The growing number of supervisory options for providing care and support to older adults ignores the fact. There are often other more senior people who want to contribute meaningfully to their entire community. Using technology to create opportunities for human-to-human or human-to-animal interaction is one way to increase well-being without sacrificing privacy. For example, in the virus season, technology can be used to develop something as simple as a phone tree to check and communicate numbers in times of social distance.
There are apps like Tech Buddy for tech-savvy seniors that offer basic tech training, including lessons on iPad, tablet, PC, laptop, smartphone, and general social media features. And, of course, the Internet can be utilized to encounter services available to help seniors. With household chores, find nursing care, or even make friendly appointments.
Other Internet-based programs have been designed to support the elderly with pets. Pet Assist, for example, in Calgary, Alta, helps older people manage pet work at home. After all, petting a robot dog is not the same as stroking a lovely pet.
Using mobile robots may reduce depression, loneliness, and irritability in the elderly. This benefit must be countered by possible ethical concerns raised by philosophers on issues such as deception, childbearing, reduced human contact, and accountability. However, research that directly assesses the prevalence of the problems among relevant stakeholders is limited. Even if their views are relevant to the debate, for example, any discrepancies between ethicists and stakeholders may in themselves be an ethical consideration. At the same time, concerns perceived by stakeholders may identify immediate obstacles to successful implementation.
In one study, 67 young people were surveyed after interacting with their pet robots while attending an intimacy show, including on intimacy for the elderly.
Ethical issues were asked about their perception. Participants generally had elderly family members, some of whom had dementia. Most participants’ results (40 out of 67, or 60%) were accompanied by an open-ended question when there was no ethical concern about using robots. Twenty people (30%) had problems, the most common of which were reduced human contact (10%) and subsequent deception (6%). However, the most worrying issue was equality of access to devices based on socioeconomic factors when choosing from the list, which went beyond common hypotheses such as childbearing and deception. The lowest scores were related to the possibility of harm and privacy concerns. More than half of the people had bought a device for one of their elderly relatives. Cost is one of the most common explanations for not purchasing a machine.
Conclusion
Although this study was relatively small, it showed discrepancies between the ethical concerns raised in the philosophical literature and those who decided to buy a mobile robot. Such differences between philosophers and “end consumers” in the care of the elderly and methods of reassurance are worth further research and empirical discussion. Participants were more concerned with economic issues and access equality, an essential consideration for those caring for the elderly. On the other hand, the concerns raised by ethicists do not seem to preclude mobile robots.
Source:https://rasekhoon.net/article/show/1587159/%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%BE%D8%AA-%D9%87%D8%A7